Overlord (light novel)
Available on Manga Store
New
Which of the following options is does represent your politics the closest?
Right
21.7%
61
Center-Right
26.7%
75
Center-Left
27.4%
77
Left
24.2%
68
281 votes
Sep 20, 2022 3:45 PM
#51
CynicalDiogenes said: What's the point of this? Can you enjoy the show for its lore and characters? Some people can't enjoy the content depending on the Fandom political agenda. |
Sep 20, 2022 3:51 PM
#52
| That is sad. I like analyzing politics in show but not to the point that it affects my enjoyment. |
Sep 20, 2022 3:52 PM
#53
CynicalDiogenes said: That is sad. I like analyzing politics in show but not to the point that it affects my enjoyment. Each person has a different level of tolerance. |
Sep 20, 2022 3:53 PM
#54
RogerCop said: CynicalDiogenes said: That is sad. I like analyzing politics in show but not to the point that it affects my enjoyment. Each person has a different level of tolerance. Yes but it's just absurd. Lemme ask what country are you from? |
Sep 20, 2022 3:54 PM
#55
| should have added an option like “rather not say” or “not enjoying s3” or “click for results” because i’m not really liking s3 so far and just wanted to see the results but had to click my political affiliation in order to see it. the votes are just getting drowned out like this |
Sep 20, 2022 3:54 PM
#56
CynicalDiogenes said: RogerCop said: CynicalDiogenes said: That is sad. I like analyzing politics in show but not to the point that it affects my enjoyment. Each person has a different level of tolerance. Yes but it's just absurd. Lemme ask what country are you from? Peculiar question, but Portugal. Why? |
Sep 20, 2022 3:54 PM
#57
RogerCop said: EggoGBones said: RogerCop said: EggoGBones said: None I hate politics but absolutely love Overlord and its politics. May I recommend human history, I believe overlord was inspired by it. Yeah I like history I'm just not a fan of politics. I know Overlord isn't the most original but I really enjoy it personally. I'm just saying that medieval times politics are quite fun to learn. I took a medieval class it was very interesting. I'm more hating on modern politics when I meant that. Not sure why this is even a thread on Mal of all places tho |
| As Long as the Sun, the moon, and the Earth exist, everything will be alright. |
Sep 20, 2022 3:57 PM
#58
INSANELYWP said: should have added an option like “rather not say” or “not enjoying s3” or “click for results” because i’m not really liking s3 so far and just wanted to see the results but had to click my political affiliation in order to see it. the votes are just getting drowned out like this This way op manages to get no neutral answers, since lets be real most "neutrals" have very strong political opinions about certain topics. |
Sep 20, 2022 3:58 PM
#59
| The country you live can be an explanation for people's fascination towards political affiliation. I don't know a lot about Portugal's political discourse so I can't really comment. |
Sep 20, 2022 3:58 PM
#60
RogerCop said: ktg said: RogerCop said: ktg said: RogerCop said: ktg said: RogerCop said: MxrcoH1Ibxr said: RogerCop said: MxrcoH1Ibxr said: Tf is wrong with you?? XD Animes and politics k bro get a life... Imagine taking everything seriously....... Animes are getting quite political nowadays, with the Lolis and tr*ps, not sure if it's allowed to say the word here. Bruh it's fictional not even real.... Think about that, whats going on in real life??.... Please and people thinking about fictional politics standards.... K Bro...... Everything is political, your freedom included, I'm libertarian because I believe that there should be no restrictions in fictional art, but there are many more authoritarian leaning people that believe there should be a line. I'm only from the right since I disagree with many of the left opinions, simply look too utopian for me, unrealistic if you will. I can argue with this. :D That's only works if we have the BEST possible education system EVERYWHERE on the planet, which sounds like an utopia. :D If you let everyone do anything in fiction, then it is possible to "teach" bad things through fiction. If someone had bad education, he could believe what he learnt from the show. Let's say the show teaches everyone to murder their neighbor and offer his body to a God. If someone can't understand the difference between reality and fiction, or understand the concept in the show and he believe it, then it could be really bad. You can't separate fiction from reality, because fiction's concepts based on reality and fiction's ideas could form reality. With your idea, you would actually make incitement legal. As for your view about left, doesn't the utopian concept, itself, make you fight for it? Or doesn't the history prove that it was the right way? I mean compared to like the 18th centuries we definitely shifted towards a more liberal and more left oriented world. I work in IT and lot of ideas what you can find on left right now are quite realistic, but I don't consider myself leftist. :D Then it comes the question, should we restrict freedom of speech by an arbitrary line for sick people incapable of distinction between reality or fiction, or should we allow unrestricted freedom of speech and punish the ones who can't see the difference, punishment being the law system. I don't think we should be fighting for a utopia since our humanity simply won't allow it, making the only possible way to create utopia being through extreme authoritarianism, wich I'm not a big fan. And you say that we live in better conditions, while physically you're correct, mentally we are in one of the worst times in history, so no I don't agree with the left. But we don't talk about small amount of people here. Let's just look at USA right now. The republicans and democrats say completely different things. Both sides cannot be right and yet they have similar number of voters. The thing is currently it's much more safer to restrict freedom of speech. Because in America we talk about 2 similar sized blocks, but I know countries where the "wrong" people are actually the majority. And yes, they, without a doubt, burn your house to the ground if their politicians would say so. (And it still sounds like you want to make incitement legal. :D ) Why wouldn't humanity allow it? If everyone is perfectly educated then everyone would vote for the best option. So everyone would vote for one party. I mean I assumed you were talking about our election systems. And how are we mentally one of the worst, when 200 years ago every second person was crazy, had PTSD or some other shit? We have a mentally much stable generation. And mostly because we actually somewhat care about mental health. EDIT: Please, reply in a comment, reacting like this is much harder. :D No, there is no unified goal, like communism on the left. Because then I could say the right is about dictatorship but under corporates or they want kings again. I'll give examples then, 4 day working week, unconditional basic income. These are pretty realistic goals. I was referring to the world, but using USA has an example, you should know that those people you're talking about are very much in the minority and that I was referring to purely fictional regions, so the incentive to cause real world damage is not something I support since it's no longer fictional. That education you're talking about is really starting to sound like 1984,but that aside there's no perfect education since every individual is different and those kind of wishes will stay whishes since people aren't robots. And you should know about the suicide statistics, we are more alone than ever even with unprecedented numbers, we lack purpose, the world is dying and we're fully aware of it... We're very bad mentally and your health isn't going to save it, but only help it like a medication not cure it. But you can't separate fiction from reality. Because fiction affects reality in every way. You mentioned suicide. There are shows about suicide and if the show introduce a new point of view or new argument about suicide, then you could use it in a real life. What is wrong with that education? In elections there is always a best option, if everyone could perfectly understand the situation, then everyone would vote for the best option. Suicide statistics are like nothing compared to what war did to the human mind. And war actually affected everyone, because it was everywhere. We are still far the most mentally health generation. (If we lack purpose, then a dream, a goal like a utopian goal could help humanity. You know, the one that you don't like. :DD ) Arguments and incitives are very different, that aside those fictional projects won't be able to do any harm to any sane person so it doesn't matter either way. I'll simply say that your best option isn't the best option for everyone. War is very much a recent event so it kind of proves my point about left progression, that aside you still can't see that the problems right now aren't physical but psychological, people feel little and unimportant, they feel depressed and want to end everything, it's simple this is a bad consequence. And why the :D it really doesn't feel appropriate for these topics. But you don't vote for the best option for yourself. You should vote for the best option for your country, because actually that's the point of the voting. You can examples in the real world, where many rich people are perfectly fine with paying higher taxes if it helps the country. It's not their personal best option, but better for the country. What war are you talking about? :D We are living the a most peaceful era. Wars 200 years ago were part of the daily routine. We are really far from there and the Russia-Ukraine war proves that how alienated we are from the war. The :Ds are there because I find it funny how you present problems that actually could be solved by things that you are against it. If people feel like they don't have a purpose, then an ideology that would create a purpose, would create a goal, is a really good solution even if you consider the end goal unrealistic. But it's much more funny how you think people are much worse state mentally speaking than they were like 200 years ago. |
Sep 20, 2022 3:59 PM
#61
EggoGBones said: RogerCop said: EggoGBones said: RogerCop said: EggoGBones said: None I hate politics but absolutely love Overlord and its politics. May I recommend human history, I believe overlord was inspired by it. Yeah I like history I'm just not a fan of politics. I know Overlord isn't the most original but I really enjoy it personally. I'm just saying that medieval times politics are quite fun to learn. I took a medieval class it was very interesting. I'm more hating on modern politics when I meant that. Not sure why this is even a thread on Mal of all places tho Modern time politics might seem boring because it's all bark no bite. But I do recommend reading some historical events since they are quite interesting. |
Sep 20, 2022 4:04 PM
#62
Sep 20, 2022 4:08 PM
#63
ktg said: RogerCop said: ktg said: RogerCop said: ktg said: RogerCop said: ktg said: RogerCop said: MxrcoH1Ibxr said: RogerCop said: MxrcoH1Ibxr said: Tf is wrong with you?? XD Animes and politics k bro get a life... Imagine taking everything seriously....... Animes are getting quite political nowadays, with the Lolis and tr*ps, not sure if it's allowed to say the word here. Bruh it's fictional not even real.... Think about that, whats going on in real life??.... Please and people thinking about fictional politics standards.... K Bro...... Everything is political, your freedom included, I'm libertarian because I believe that there should be no restrictions in fictional art, but there are many more authoritarian leaning people that believe there should be a line. I'm only from the right since I disagree with many of the left opinions, simply look too utopian for me, unrealistic if you will. I can argue with this. :D That's only works if we have the BEST possible education system EVERYWHERE on the planet, which sounds like an utopia. :D If you let everyone do anything in fiction, then it is possible to "teach" bad things through fiction. If someone had bad education, he could believe what he learnt from the show. Let's say the show teaches everyone to murder their neighbor and offer his body to a God. If someone can't understand the difference between reality and fiction, or understand the concept in the show and he believe it, then it could be really bad. You can't separate fiction from reality, because fiction's concepts based on reality and fiction's ideas could form reality. With your idea, you would actually make incitement legal. As for your view about left, doesn't the utopian concept, itself, make you fight for it? Or doesn't the history prove that it was the right way? I mean compared to like the 18th centuries we definitely shifted towards a more liberal and more left oriented world. I work in IT and lot of ideas what you can find on left right now are quite realistic, but I don't consider myself leftist. :D Then it comes the question, should we restrict freedom of speech by an arbitrary line for sick people incapable of distinction between reality or fiction, or should we allow unrestricted freedom of speech and punish the ones who can't see the difference, punishment being the law system. I don't think we should be fighting for a utopia since our humanity simply won't allow it, making the only possible way to create utopia being through extreme authoritarianism, wich I'm not a big fan. And you say that we live in better conditions, while physically you're correct, mentally we are in one of the worst times in history, so no I don't agree with the left. But we don't talk about small amount of people here. Let's just look at USA right now. The republicans and democrats say completely different things. Both sides cannot be right and yet they have similar number of voters. The thing is currently it's much more safer to restrict freedom of speech. Because in America we talk about 2 similar sized blocks, but I know countries where the "wrong" people are actually the majority. And yes, they, without a doubt, burn your house to the ground if their politicians would say so. (And it still sounds like you want to make incitement legal. :D ) Why wouldn't humanity allow it? If everyone is perfectly educated then everyone would vote for the best option. So everyone would vote for one party. I mean I assumed you were talking about our election systems. And how are we mentally one of the worst, when 200 years ago every second person was crazy, had PTSD or some other shit? We have a mentally much stable generation. And mostly because we actually somewhat care about mental health. EDIT: Please, reply in a comment, reacting like this is much harder. :D No, there is no unified goal, like communism on the left. Because then I could say the right is about dictatorship but under corporates or they want kings again. I'll give examples then, 4 day working week, unconditional basic income. These are pretty realistic goals. I was referring to the world, but using USA has an example, you should know that those people you're talking about are very much in the minority and that I was referring to purely fictional regions, so the incentive to cause real world damage is not something I support since it's no longer fictional. That education you're talking about is really starting to sound like 1984,but that aside there's no perfect education since every individual is different and those kind of wishes will stay whishes since people aren't robots. And you should know about the suicide statistics, we are more alone than ever even with unprecedented numbers, we lack purpose, the world is dying and we're fully aware of it... We're very bad mentally and your health isn't going to save it, but only help it like a medication not cure it. But you can't separate fiction from reality. Because fiction affects reality in every way. You mentioned suicide. There are shows about suicide and if the show introduce a new point of view or new argument about suicide, then you could use it in a real life. What is wrong with that education? In elections there is always a best option, if everyone could perfectly understand the situation, then everyone would vote for the best option. Suicide statistics are like nothing compared to what war did to the human mind. And war actually affected everyone, because it was everywhere. We are still far the most mentally health generation. (If we lack purpose, then a dream, a goal like a utopian goal could help humanity. You know, the one that you don't like. :DD ) Arguments and incitives are very different, that aside those fictional projects won't be able to do any harm to any sane person so it doesn't matter either way. I'll simply say that your best option isn't the best option for everyone. War is very much a recent event so it kind of proves my point about left progression, that aside you still can't see that the problems right now aren't physical but psychological, people feel little and unimportant, they feel depressed and want to end everything, it's simple this is a bad consequence. And why the :D it really doesn't feel appropriate for these topics. But you don't vote for the best option for yourself. You should vote for the best option for your country, because actually that's the point of the voting. You can examples in the real world, where many rich people are perfectly fine with paying higher taxes if it helps the country. It's not their personal best option, but better for the country. What war are you talking about? :D We are living the a most peaceful era. Wars 200 years ago were part of the daily routine. We are really far from there and the Russia-Ukraine war proves that how alienated we are from the war. The :Ds are there because I find it funny how you present problems that actually could be solved by things that you are against it. If people feel like they don't have a purpose, then an ideology that would create a purpose, would create a goal, is a really good solution even if you consider the end goal unrealistic. But it's much more funny how you think people are much worse state mentally speaking than they were like 200 years ago. Again what you consider better for the country isn't universal, some people prefer anarchy others capitalism, so they will try everything to make their ideal world come true and your education won't work since each person is unique and you would require a 1984 scenario to enforce that. Wars like the one the cold war and the 2 world war, they differently were considerably recent and saying that something similar won't happen again is follish. That goal you want to create won't be followed because in case you haven't noticed people stopped recycling because they no longer believe that the world can be saved, you're severely overestimating the human mind. And besides we already have what you're talking about its called religion. |
Sep 20, 2022 4:08 PM
#64
ktg said: RogerCop said: ktg said: RogerCop said: ktg said: RogerCop said: ktg said: RogerCop said: MxrcoH1Ibxr said: RogerCop said: MxrcoH1Ibxr said: Tf is wrong with you?? XD Animes and politics k bro get a life... Imagine taking everything seriously....... Animes are getting quite political nowadays, with the Lolis and tr*ps, not sure if it's allowed to say the word here. Bruh it's fictional not even real.... Think about that, whats going on in real life??.... Please and people thinking about fictional politics standards.... K Bro...... Everything is political, your freedom included, I'm libertarian because I believe that there should be no restrictions in fictional art, but there are many more authoritarian leaning people that believe there should be a line. I'm only from the right since I disagree with many of the left opinions, simply look too utopian for me, unrealistic if you will. I can argue with this. :D That's only works if we have the BEST possible education system EVERYWHERE on the planet, which sounds like an utopia. :D If you let everyone do anything in fiction, then it is possible to "teach" bad things through fiction. If someone had bad education, he could believe what he learnt from the show. Let's say the show teaches everyone to murder their neighbor and offer his body to a God. If someone can't understand the difference between reality and fiction, or understand the concept in the show and he believe it, then it could be really bad. You can't separate fiction from reality, because fiction's concepts based on reality and fiction's ideas could form reality. With your idea, you would actually make incitement legal. As for your view about left, doesn't the utopian concept, itself, make you fight for it? Or doesn't the history prove that it was the right way? I mean compared to like the 18th centuries we definitely shifted towards a more liberal and more left oriented world. I work in IT and lot of ideas what you can find on left right now are quite realistic, but I don't consider myself leftist. :D Then it comes the question, should we restrict freedom of speech by an arbitrary line for sick people incapable of distinction between reality or fiction, or should we allow unrestricted freedom of speech and punish the ones who can't see the difference, punishment being the law system. I don't think we should be fighting for a utopia since our humanity simply won't allow it, making the only possible way to create utopia being through extreme authoritarianism, wich I'm not a big fan. And you say that we live in better conditions, while physically you're correct, mentally we are in one of the worst times in history, so no I don't agree with the left. But we don't talk about small amount of people here. Let's just look at USA right now. The republicans and democrats say completely different things. Both sides cannot be right and yet they have similar number of voters. The thing is currently it's much more safer to restrict freedom of speech. Because in America we talk about 2 similar sized blocks, but I know countries where the "wrong" people are actually the majority. And yes, they, without a doubt, burn your house to the ground if their politicians would say so. (And it still sounds like you want to make incitement legal. :D ) Why wouldn't humanity allow it? If everyone is perfectly educated then everyone would vote for the best option. So everyone would vote for one party. I mean I assumed you were talking about our election systems. And how are we mentally one of the worst, when 200 years ago every second person was crazy, had PTSD or some other shit? We have a mentally much stable generation. And mostly because we actually somewhat care about mental health. EDIT: Please, reply in a comment, reacting like this is much harder. :D No, there is no unified goal, like communism on the left. Because then I could say the right is about dictatorship but under corporates or they want kings again. I'll give examples then, 4 day working week, unconditional basic income. These are pretty realistic goals. I was referring to the world, but using USA has an example, you should know that those people you're talking about are very much in the minority and that I was referring to purely fictional regions, so the incentive to cause real world damage is not something I support since it's no longer fictional. That education you're talking about is really starting to sound like 1984,but that aside there's no perfect education since every individual is different and those kind of wishes will stay whishes since people aren't robots. And you should know about the suicide statistics, we are more alone than ever even with unprecedented numbers, we lack purpose, the world is dying and we're fully aware of it... We're very bad mentally and your health isn't going to save it, but only help it like a medication not cure it. But you can't separate fiction from reality. Because fiction affects reality in every way. You mentioned suicide. There are shows about suicide and if the show introduce a new point of view or new argument about suicide, then you could use it in a real life. What is wrong with that education? In elections there is always a best option, if everyone could perfectly understand the situation, then everyone would vote for the best option. Suicide statistics are like nothing compared to what war did to the human mind. And war actually affected everyone, because it was everywhere. We are still far the most mentally health generation. (If we lack purpose, then a dream, a goal like a utopian goal could help humanity. You know, the one that you don't like. :DD ) Arguments and incitives are very different, that aside those fictional projects won't be able to do any harm to any sane person so it doesn't matter either way. I'll simply say that your best option isn't the best option for everyone. War is very much a recent event so it kind of proves my point about left progression, that aside you still can't see that the problems right now aren't physical but psychological, people feel little and unimportant, they feel depressed and want to end everything, it's simple this is a bad consequence. And why the :D it really doesn't feel appropriate for these topics. But you don't vote for the best option for yourself. You should vote for the best option for your country, because actually that's the point of the voting. You can examples in the real world, where many rich people are perfectly fine with paying higher taxes if it helps the country. It's not their personal best option, but better for the country. What war are you talking about? :D We are living the a most peaceful era. Wars 200 years ago were part of the daily routine. We are really far from there and the Russia-Ukraine war proves that how alienated we are from the war. The :Ds are there because I find it funny how you present problems that actually could be solved by things that you are against it. If people feel like they don't have a purpose, then an ideology that would create a purpose, would create a goal, is a really good solution even if you consider the end goal unrealistic. But it's much more funny how you think people are much worse state mentally speaking than they were like 200 years ago. Again what you consider better for the country isn't universal, some people prefer anarchy others capitalism, so they will try everything to make their ideal world come true and your education won't work since each person is unique and you would require a 1984 scenario to enforce that. Wars like the one the cold war and the 2 world war, they differently were considerably recent and saying that something similar won't happen again is follish. That goal you want to create won't be followed because in case you haven't noticed people stopped recycling because they no longer believe that the world can be saved, you're severely overestimating the human mind. And besides we already have what you're talking about its called religion. |
Sep 20, 2022 4:10 PM
#65
ktg said: RogerCop said: ktg said: RogerCop said: ktg said: RogerCop said: ktg said: RogerCop said: MxrcoH1Ibxr said: RogerCop said: MxrcoH1Ibxr said: Tf is wrong with you?? XD Animes and politics k bro get a life... Imagine taking everything seriously....... Animes are getting quite political nowadays, with the Lolis and tr*ps, not sure if it's allowed to say the word here. Bruh it's fictional not even real.... Think about that, whats going on in real life??.... Please and people thinking about fictional politics standards.... K Bro...... Everything is political, your freedom included, I'm libertarian because I believe that there should be no restrictions in fictional art, but there are many more authoritarian leaning people that believe there should be a line. I'm only from the right since I disagree with many of the left opinions, simply look too utopian for me, unrealistic if you will. I can argue with this. :D That's only works if we have the BEST possible education system EVERYWHERE on the planet, which sounds like an utopia. :D If you let everyone do anything in fiction, then it is possible to "teach" bad things through fiction. If someone had bad education, he could believe what he learnt from the show. Let's say the show teaches everyone to murder their neighbor and offer his body to a God. If someone can't understand the difference between reality and fiction, or understand the concept in the show and he believe it, then it could be really bad. You can't separate fiction from reality, because fiction's concepts based on reality and fiction's ideas could form reality. With your idea, you would actually make incitement legal. As for your view about left, doesn't the utopian concept, itself, make you fight for it? Or doesn't the history prove that it was the right way? I mean compared to like the 18th centuries we definitely shifted towards a more liberal and more left oriented world. I work in IT and lot of ideas what you can find on left right now are quite realistic, but I don't consider myself leftist. :D Then it comes the question, should we restrict freedom of speech by an arbitrary line for sick people incapable of distinction between reality or fiction, or should we allow unrestricted freedom of speech and punish the ones who can't see the difference, punishment being the law system. I don't think we should be fighting for a utopia since our humanity simply won't allow it, making the only possible way to create utopia being through extreme authoritarianism, wich I'm not a big fan. And you say that we live in better conditions, while physically you're correct, mentally we are in one of the worst times in history, so no I don't agree with the left. But we don't talk about small amount of people here. Let's just look at USA right now. The republicans and democrats say completely different things. Both sides cannot be right and yet they have similar number of voters. The thing is currently it's much more safer to restrict freedom of speech. Because in America we talk about 2 similar sized blocks, but I know countries where the "wrong" people are actually the majority. And yes, they, without a doubt, burn your house to the ground if their politicians would say so. (And it still sounds like you want to make incitement legal. :D ) Why wouldn't humanity allow it? If everyone is perfectly educated then everyone would vote for the best option. So everyone would vote for one party. I mean I assumed you were talking about our election systems. And how are we mentally one of the worst, when 200 years ago every second person was crazy, had PTSD or some other shit? We have a mentally much stable generation. And mostly because we actually somewhat care about mental health. EDIT: Please, reply in a comment, reacting like this is much harder. :D No, there is no unified goal, like communism on the left. Because then I could say the right is about dictatorship but under corporates or they want kings again. I'll give examples then, 4 day working week, unconditional basic income. These are pretty realistic goals. I was referring to the world, but using USA has an example, you should know that those people you're talking about are very much in the minority and that I was referring to purely fictional regions, so the incentive to cause real world damage is not something I support since it's no longer fictional. That education you're talking about is really starting to sound like 1984,but that aside there's no perfect education since every individual is different and those kind of wishes will stay whishes since people aren't robots. And you should know about the suicide statistics, we are more alone than ever even with unprecedented numbers, we lack purpose, the world is dying and we're fully aware of it... We're very bad mentally and your health isn't going to save it, but only help it like a medication not cure it. But you can't separate fiction from reality. Because fiction affects reality in every way. You mentioned suicide. There are shows about suicide and if the show introduce a new point of view or new argument about suicide, then you could use it in a real life. What is wrong with that education? In elections there is always a best option, if everyone could perfectly understand the situation, then everyone would vote for the best option. Suicide statistics are like nothing compared to what war did to the human mind. And war actually affected everyone, because it was everywhere. We are still far the most mentally health generation. (If we lack purpose, then a dream, a goal like a utopian goal could help humanity. You know, the one that you don't like. :DD ) Arguments and incitives are very different, that aside those fictional projects won't be able to do any harm to any sane person so it doesn't matter either way. I'll simply say that your best option isn't the best option for everyone. War is very much a recent event so it kind of proves my point about left progression, that aside you still can't see that the problems right now aren't physical but psychological, people feel little and unimportant, they feel depressed and want to end everything, it's simple this is a bad consequence. And why the :D it really doesn't feel appropriate for these topics. But you don't vote for the best option for yourself. You should vote for the best option for your country, because actually that's the point of the voting. You can examples in the real world, where many rich people are perfectly fine with paying higher taxes if it helps the country. It's not their personal best option, but better for the country. What war are you talking about? :D We are living the a most peaceful era. Wars 200 years ago were part of the daily routine. We are really far from there and the Russia-Ukraine war proves that how alienated we are from the war. The :Ds are there because I find it funny how you present problems that actually could be solved by things that you are against it. If people feel like they don't have a purpose, then an ideology that would create a purpose, would create a goal, is a really good solution even if you consider the end goal unrealistic. But it's much more funny how you think people are much worse state mentally speaking than they were like 200 years ago. Again what you consider better for the country isn't universal, some people prefer anarchy others capitalism, so they will try everything to make their ideal world come true and your education won't work since each person is unique and you would require a 1984 scenario to enforce that. Wars like the one the cold war and the 2 world war, they differently were considerably recent and saying that something similar won't happen again is follish. That goal you want to create won't be followed because in case you haven't noticed people stopped recycling because they no longer believe that the world can be saved, you're severely overestimating the human mind. And besides we already have what you're talking about its called religion. |
Sep 20, 2022 4:12 PM
#66
ktg said: RogerCop said: ktg said: RogerCop said: ktg said: RogerCop said: ktg said: RogerCop said: MxrcoH1Ibxr said: RogerCop said: MxrcoH1Ibxr said: Tf is wrong with you?? XD Animes and politics k bro get a life... Imagine taking everything seriously....... Animes are getting quite political nowadays, with the Lolis and tr*ps, not sure if it's allowed to say the word here. Bruh it's fictional not even real.... Think about that, whats going on in real life??.... Please and people thinking about fictional politics standards.... K Bro...... Everything is political, your freedom included, I'm libertarian because I believe that there should be no restrictions in fictional art, but there are many more authoritarian leaning people that believe there should be a line. I'm only from the right since I disagree with many of the left opinions, simply look too utopian for me, unrealistic if you will. I can argue with this. :D That's only works if we have the BEST possible education system EVERYWHERE on the planet, which sounds like an utopia. :D If you let everyone do anything in fiction, then it is possible to "teach" bad things through fiction. If someone had bad education, he could believe what he learnt from the show. Let's say the show teaches everyone to murder their neighbor and offer his body to a God. If someone can't understand the difference between reality and fiction, or understand the concept in the show and he believe it, then it could be really bad. You can't separate fiction from reality, because fiction's concepts based on reality and fiction's ideas could form reality. With your idea, you would actually make incitement legal. As for your view about left, doesn't the utopian concept, itself, make you fight for it? Or doesn't the history prove that it was the right way? I mean compared to like the 18th centuries we definitely shifted towards a more liberal and more left oriented world. I work in IT and lot of ideas what you can find on left right now are quite realistic, but I don't consider myself leftist. :D Then it comes the question, should we restrict freedom of speech by an arbitrary line for sick people incapable of distinction between reality or fiction, or should we allow unrestricted freedom of speech and punish the ones who can't see the difference, punishment being the law system. I don't think we should be fighting for a utopia since our humanity simply won't allow it, making the only possible way to create utopia being through extreme authoritarianism, wich I'm not a big fan. And you say that we live in better conditions, while physically you're correct, mentally we are in one of the worst times in history, so no I don't agree with the left. But we don't talk about small amount of people here. Let's just look at USA right now. The republicans and democrats say completely different things. Both sides cannot be right and yet they have similar number of voters. The thing is currently it's much more safer to restrict freedom of speech. Because in America we talk about 2 similar sized blocks, but I know countries where the "wrong" people are actually the majority. And yes, they, without a doubt, burn your house to the ground if their politicians would say so. (And it still sounds like you want to make incitement legal. :D ) Why wouldn't humanity allow it? If everyone is perfectly educated then everyone would vote for the best option. So everyone would vote for one party. I mean I assumed you were talking about our election systems. And how are we mentally one of the worst, when 200 years ago every second person was crazy, had PTSD or some other shit? We have a mentally much stable generation. And mostly because we actually somewhat care about mental health. EDIT: Please, reply in a comment, reacting like this is much harder. :D No, there is no unified goal, like communism on the left. Because then I could say the right is about dictatorship but under corporates or they want kings again. I'll give examples then, 4 day working week, unconditional basic income. These are pretty realistic goals. I was referring to the world, but using USA has an example, you should know that those people you're talking about are very much in the minority and that I was referring to purely fictional regions, so the incentive to cause real world damage is not something I support since it's no longer fictional. That education you're talking about is really starting to sound like 1984,but that aside there's no perfect education since every individual is different and those kind of wishes will stay whishes since people aren't robots. And you should know about the suicide statistics, we are more alone than ever even with unprecedented numbers, we lack purpose, the world is dying and we're fully aware of it... We're very bad mentally and your health isn't going to save it, but only help it like a medication not cure it. But you can't separate fiction from reality. Because fiction affects reality in every way. You mentioned suicide. There are shows about suicide and if the show introduce a new point of view or new argument about suicide, then you could use it in a real life. What is wrong with that education? In elections there is always a best option, if everyone could perfectly understand the situation, then everyone would vote for the best option. Suicide statistics are like nothing compared to what war did to the human mind. And war actually affected everyone, because it was everywhere. We are still far the most mentally health generation. (If we lack purpose, then a dream, a goal like a utopian goal could help humanity. You know, the one that you don't like. :DD ) Arguments and incitives are very different, that aside those fictional projects won't be able to do any harm to any sane person so it doesn't matter either way. I'll simply say that your best option isn't the best option for everyone. War is very much a recent event so it kind of proves my point about left progression, that aside you still can't see that the problems right now aren't physical but psychological, people feel little and unimportant, they feel depressed and want to end everything, it's simple this is a bad consequence. And why the :D it really doesn't feel appropriate for these topics. But you don't vote for the best option for yourself. You should vote for the best option for your country, because actually that's the point of the voting. You can examples in the real world, where many rich people are perfectly fine with paying higher taxes if it helps the country. It's not their personal best option, but better for the country. What war are you talking about? :D We are living the a most peaceful era. Wars 200 years ago were part of the daily routine. We are really far from there and the Russia-Ukraine war proves that how alienated we are from the war. The :Ds are there because I find it funny how you present problems that actually could be solved by things that you are against it. If people feel like they don't have a purpose, then an ideology that would create a purpose, would create a goal, is a really good solution even if you consider the end goal unrealistic. But it's much more funny how you think people are much worse state mentally speaking than they were like 200 years ago. Again what you consider better for the country isn't universal, some people prefer anarchy others capitalism, so they will try everything to make their ideal world come true and your education won't work since each person is unique and you would require a 1984 scenario to enforce that. Wars like the one the cold war and the 2 world war, they differently were considerably recent and saying that something similar won't happen again is follish. That goal you want to create won't be followed because in case you haven't noticed people stopped recycling because they no longer believe that the world can be saved, you're severely overestimating the human mind. And besides we already have what you're talking about its called religion. |
Sep 20, 2022 4:17 PM
#67
| left. and not that American """left""" that's actually centre left at best. |
Sep 20, 2022 4:17 PM
#68
CynicalDiogenes said: The country you live can be an explanation for people's fascination towards political affiliation. I don't know a lot about Portugal's political discourse so I can't really comment. I'm not the op, but either way, there's no cultural political fascination in my country, we just tend to be quite extreme. |
Sep 20, 2022 4:18 PM
#69
Oni_Zokuchou said: left. and not that American """left""" that's actually centre left at best. American left is quite extremist, how much more are you implying. |
Sep 20, 2022 4:40 PM
#70
| What's sad about current state of politics, is that the whole terms of "right wing" and "left wing" became completely nebulous. If you are so extremely far on one side of political spectrum, then you'll wrongly perceive anyone who does not agree with you 100% as being on the extreme far of the opposite part of the spectrum. For example, Jordan Peterson is a "far right Nazi" according to some, which is ludicrous thing to say. Any subject related to politics will end up in toxicity, and we all want to not assiciate it with anime. Thread closed. |
Sep 20, 2022 4:42 PM
#71
| it is of my humble opinion that toxic posts like these, on MAL, should be met with a swift permaban. OP means nothing else other than to create drama and cause fights |
Sep 20, 2022 5:43 PM
#73
| Quire a funny idea that people have to be on one side or the other to enjoy a show that doesn't even have a political message. |
Sep 20, 2022 6:47 PM
#74
Piromysl said: we all want to not assiciate it with anime. If only that were true. |
Sep 20, 2022 9:19 PM
#76
MyllerPhiem said: RioFS said: Crazy how OP still thinks people dying in a work of fiction is equivalent to people dying in real life. No, I think enjoying the sight of people being brutally murdered is terrible no matter if its fictional or not. Lol what a loser 🤡 |
Sep 20, 2022 9:36 PM
#77
| ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ I don't know what kinda poll is this, give some specifics before adding a poll lmao |
| It's not that I dislike this genre but... to add unnecessary fan services to/in/for heroines and ultimately destroys her character and personality; their purity tarnished because of it, is the only thing I hope to not happen to them. For that sole purity is my fan service. |
Sep 20, 2022 11:35 PM
#78
| op must be a massive troll if not please stop projecting your insecurities in people watching anime for fun. |
Sep 21, 2022 2:09 AM
#79
CynicalDiogenes said: The country you live can be an explanation for people's fascination towards political affiliation. I don't know a lot about Portugal's political discourse so I can't really comment. It can also be an explanation for people's fascination of fascist anime characters and enjoying the effortless murder of people. |
| If you haven't watched "Fantastic Children", don't talk about "best anime". Thank you. |
Sep 21, 2022 2:11 AM
#80
GTRaijin said: This "37 years old man" hates the sight of people being brutally murdered while having Satou as his favourite character and profile picture and talking shit in anime forums. Smh. Satou, an underdog who literally fights the whole world with anything but god-like powers. If you want to compare his powers to Ainz', you haven't see Ajin. |
| If you haven't watched "Fantastic Children", don't talk about "best anime". Thank you. |
Sep 21, 2022 2:11 AM
#81
RogerCop said: American left is German right, lol.Oni_Zokuchou said: left. and not that American """left""" that's actually centre left at best. American left is quite extremist, how much more are you implying. |
| If you haven't watched "Fantastic Children", don't talk about "best anime". Thank you. |
Sep 21, 2022 2:12 AM
#82
TheOsprey said: Why was this created Yeah, why was your posting created? It didn't add anything to debate. |
| If you haven't watched "Fantastic Children", don't talk about "best anime". Thank you. |
Sep 21, 2022 2:14 AM
#83
MyllerPhiem said: RogerCop said: American left is German right, lol.Oni_Zokuchou said: left. and not that American """left""" that's actually centre left at best. American left is quite extremist, how much more are you implying. What? The American left is one of the most extreme in the world, here in Europe we can only dream about reaching your level. |
Sep 21, 2022 2:15 AM
#84
MyllerPhiem said: GTRaijin said: This "37 years old man" hates the sight of people being brutally murdered while having Satou as his favourite character and profile picture and talking shit in anime forums. Smh. Satou, an underdog who literally fights the whole world with anything but god-like powers. If you want to compare his powers to Ainz', you haven't see Ajin. Huh? He slaughters people like flies also he is pretty much immortal. So he is indeed overpowered as hell in Ajin's world, same as Ainz is in Overlord's. |
Sep 21, 2022 2:18 AM
#85
GTRaijin said: MyllerPhiem said: GTRaijin said: This "37 years old man" hates the sight of people being brutally murdered while having Satou as his favourite character and profile picture and talking shit in anime forums. Smh. Satou, an underdog who literally fights the whole world with anything but god-like powers. If you want to compare his powers to Ainz', you haven't see Ajin. Huh? He slaughters people like flies also he is pretty much immortal. So he is indeed overpowered as hell in Ajin's world, same as Ainz is in Overlord's. Again he's an absolute underdog. You have not seen Ajin. |
| If you haven't watched "Fantastic Children", don't talk about "best anime". Thank you. |
Sep 21, 2022 2:19 AM
#86
RogerCop said: MyllerPhiem said: RogerCop said: Oni_Zokuchou said: left. and not that American """left""" that's actually centre left at best. American left is quite extremist, how much more are you implying. What? The American left is one of the most extreme in the world, here in Europe we can only dream about reaching your level. Lol. Are you American? Because only an American would call democrats "extremely left". |
| If you haven't watched "Fantastic Children", don't talk about "best anime". Thank you. |
Sep 21, 2022 2:20 AM
#87
MyllerPhiem said: GTRaijin said: MyllerPhiem said: GTRaijin said: This "37 years old man" hates the sight of people being brutally murdered while having Satou as his favourite character and profile picture and talking shit in anime forums. Smh. Satou, an underdog who literally fights the whole world with anything but god-like powers. If you want to compare his powers to Ainz', you haven't see Ajin. Huh? He slaughters people like flies also he is pretty much immortal. So he is indeed overpowered as hell in Ajin's world, same as Ainz is in Overlord's. Again he's an absolute underdog. You have not seen Ajin. Wdym I haven't seen Ajin? I don't think you are watching the same anime as everyone else. |
Sep 21, 2022 2:23 AM
#88
MyllerPhiem said: RogerCop said: MyllerPhiem said: RogerCop said: American left is German right, lol.Oni_Zokuchou said: left. and not that American """left""" that's actually centre left at best. American left is quite extremist, how much more are you implying. What? The American left is one of the most extreme in the world, here in Europe we can only dream about reaching your level. Lol. Are you American? Because only an American would call democrats "extremely left". No, I'm from Europe, hence why I told you that you are very extreme. |
Sep 21, 2022 2:36 AM
#89
MyllerPhiem said: CynicalDiogenes said: The country you live can be an explanation for people's fascination towards political affiliation. I don't know a lot about Portugal's political discourse so I can't really comment. It can also be an explanation for people's fascination of fascist anime characters and enjoying the effortless murder of people. Hey, don't talk shit about my country. |
Sep 21, 2022 6:37 AM
#90
RogerCop said: ktg said: RogerCop said: ktg said: RogerCop said: ktg said: RogerCop said: ktg said: RogerCop said: MxrcoH1Ibxr said: RogerCop said: MxrcoH1Ibxr said: Tf is wrong with you?? XD Animes and politics k bro get a life... Imagine taking everything seriously....... Animes are getting quite political nowadays, with the Lolis and tr*ps, not sure if it's allowed to say the word here. Bruh it's fictional not even real.... Think about that, whats going on in real life??.... Please and people thinking about fictional politics standards.... K Bro...... Everything is political, your freedom included, I'm libertarian because I believe that there should be no restrictions in fictional art, but there are many more authoritarian leaning people that believe there should be a line. I'm only from the right since I disagree with many of the left opinions, simply look too utopian for me, unrealistic if you will. I can argue with this. :D That's only works if we have the BEST possible education system EVERYWHERE on the planet, which sounds like an utopia. :D If you let everyone do anything in fiction, then it is possible to "teach" bad things through fiction. If someone had bad education, he could believe what he learnt from the show. Let's say the show teaches everyone to murder their neighbor and offer his body to a God. If someone can't understand the difference between reality and fiction, or understand the concept in the show and he believe it, then it could be really bad. You can't separate fiction from reality, because fiction's concepts based on reality and fiction's ideas could form reality. With your idea, you would actually make incitement legal. As for your view about left, doesn't the utopian concept, itself, make you fight for it? Or doesn't the history prove that it was the right way? I mean compared to like the 18th centuries we definitely shifted towards a more liberal and more left oriented world. I work in IT and lot of ideas what you can find on left right now are quite realistic, but I don't consider myself leftist. :D Then it comes the question, should we restrict freedom of speech by an arbitrary line for sick people incapable of distinction between reality or fiction, or should we allow unrestricted freedom of speech and punish the ones who can't see the difference, punishment being the law system. I don't think we should be fighting for a utopia since our humanity simply won't allow it, making the only possible way to create utopia being through extreme authoritarianism, wich I'm not a big fan. And you say that we live in better conditions, while physically you're correct, mentally we are in one of the worst times in history, so no I don't agree with the left. But we don't talk about small amount of people here. Let's just look at USA right now. The republicans and democrats say completely different things. Both sides cannot be right and yet they have similar number of voters. The thing is currently it's much more safer to restrict freedom of speech. Because in America we talk about 2 similar sized blocks, but I know countries where the "wrong" people are actually the majority. And yes, they, without a doubt, burn your house to the ground if their politicians would say so. (And it still sounds like you want to make incitement legal. :D ) Why wouldn't humanity allow it? If everyone is perfectly educated then everyone would vote for the best option. So everyone would vote for one party. I mean I assumed you were talking about our election systems. And how are we mentally one of the worst, when 200 years ago every second person was crazy, had PTSD or some other shit? We have a mentally much stable generation. And mostly because we actually somewhat care about mental health. EDIT: Please, reply in a comment, reacting like this is much harder. :D No, there is no unified goal, like communism on the left. Because then I could say the right is about dictatorship but under corporates or they want kings again. I'll give examples then, 4 day working week, unconditional basic income. These are pretty realistic goals. I was referring to the world, but using USA has an example, you should know that those people you're talking about are very much in the minority and that I was referring to purely fictional regions, so the incentive to cause real world damage is not something I support since it's no longer fictional. That education you're talking about is really starting to sound like 1984,but that aside there's no perfect education since every individual is different and those kind of wishes will stay whishes since people aren't robots. And you should know about the suicide statistics, we are more alone than ever even with unprecedented numbers, we lack purpose, the world is dying and we're fully aware of it... We're very bad mentally and your health isn't going to save it, but only help it like a medication not cure it. But you can't separate fiction from reality. Because fiction affects reality in every way. You mentioned suicide. There are shows about suicide and if the show introduce a new point of view or new argument about suicide, then you could use it in a real life. What is wrong with that education? In elections there is always a best option, if everyone could perfectly understand the situation, then everyone would vote for the best option. Suicide statistics are like nothing compared to what war did to the human mind. And war actually affected everyone, because it was everywhere. We are still far the most mentally health generation. (If we lack purpose, then a dream, a goal like a utopian goal could help humanity. You know, the one that you don't like. :DD ) Arguments and incitives are very different, that aside those fictional projects won't be able to do any harm to any sane person so it doesn't matter either way. I'll simply say that your best option isn't the best option for everyone. War is very much a recent event so it kind of proves my point about left progression, that aside you still can't see that the problems right now aren't physical but psychological, people feel little and unimportant, they feel depressed and want to end everything, it's simple this is a bad consequence. And why the :D it really doesn't feel appropriate for these topics. But you don't vote for the best option for yourself. You should vote for the best option for your country, because actually that's the point of the voting. You can examples in the real world, where many rich people are perfectly fine with paying higher taxes if it helps the country. It's not their personal best option, but better for the country. What war are you talking about? :D We are living the a most peaceful era. Wars 200 years ago were part of the daily routine. We are really far from there and the Russia-Ukraine war proves that how alienated we are from the war. The :Ds are there because I find it funny how you present problems that actually could be solved by things that you are against it. If people feel like they don't have a purpose, then an ideology that would create a purpose, would create a goal, is a really good solution even if you consider the end goal unrealistic. But it's much more funny how you think people are much worse state mentally speaking than they were like 200 years ago. Again what you consider better for the country isn't universal, some people prefer anarchy others capitalism, so they will try everything to make their ideal world come true and your education won't work since each person is unique and you would require a 1984 scenario to enforce that. Wars like the one the cold war and the 2 world war, they differently were considerably recent and saying that something similar won't happen again is follish. That goal you want to create won't be followed because in case you haven't noticed people stopped recycling because they no longer believe that the world can be saved, you're severely overestimating the human mind. And besides we already have what you're talking about its called religion. It is universal, because what you talk about is actually the "old" way of voting, where your only option is to follow your own beliefs. While nowadays there is right answer, if you follow the academical researches. My education? Haha, it is the education that needed for your freedom of speech. Those wars are pretty old compared to the new generations right now. They forgot those. While you couldn't forget them like a 100 years earlier, because it was really common. Look, it's hard to avoid using :Ds, when you truly believe people stopped recycling, because they believe they can't save the planet. Most of them don't even believe in climate change. What are you talking about? It seems like to me that you hardly ever talked with someone who is outside of your comfort zone and that makes you believe this really funny scenario where humanity already gave up. |
Sep 21, 2022 6:41 AM
#91
| Centre-right I honestly don't dig the whole politics in anime, especially isekai anime where it's the least thing you'd expect to see (unfortunately reality is different from expectations) |
"Only one with the courage to shoulder the burden of their own fate can be called a hero.." |
Sep 21, 2022 6:46 AM
#92
ktg said: RogerCop said: ktg said: RogerCop said: ktg said: RogerCop said: ktg said: RogerCop said: ktg said: RogerCop said: MxrcoH1Ibxr said: RogerCop said: MxrcoH1Ibxr said: Tf is wrong with you?? XD Animes and politics k bro get a life... Imagine taking everything seriously....... Animes are getting quite political nowadays, with the Lolis and tr*ps, not sure if it's allowed to say the word here. Bruh it's fictional not even real.... Think about that, whats going on in real life??.... Please and people thinking about fictional politics standards.... K Bro...... Everything is political, your freedom included, I'm libertarian because I believe that there should be no restrictions in fictional art, but there are many more authoritarian leaning people that believe there should be a line. I'm only from the right since I disagree with many of the left opinions, simply look too utopian for me, unrealistic if you will. I can argue with this. :D That's only works if we have the BEST possible education system EVERYWHERE on the planet, which sounds like an utopia. :D If you let everyone do anything in fiction, then it is possible to "teach" bad things through fiction. If someone had bad education, he could believe what he learnt from the show. Let's say the show teaches everyone to murder their neighbor and offer his body to a God. If someone can't understand the difference between reality and fiction, or understand the concept in the show and he believe it, then it could be really bad. You can't separate fiction from reality, because fiction's concepts based on reality and fiction's ideas could form reality. With your idea, you would actually make incitement legal. As for your view about left, doesn't the utopian concept, itself, make you fight for it? Or doesn't the history prove that it was the right way? I mean compared to like the 18th centuries we definitely shifted towards a more liberal and more left oriented world. I work in IT and lot of ideas what you can find on left right now are quite realistic, but I don't consider myself leftist. :D Then it comes the question, should we restrict freedom of speech by an arbitrary line for sick people incapable of distinction between reality or fiction, or should we allow unrestricted freedom of speech and punish the ones who can't see the difference, punishment being the law system. I don't think we should be fighting for a utopia since our humanity simply won't allow it, making the only possible way to create utopia being through extreme authoritarianism, wich I'm not a big fan. And you say that we live in better conditions, while physically you're correct, mentally we are in one of the worst times in history, so no I don't agree with the left. But we don't talk about small amount of people here. Let's just look at USA right now. The republicans and democrats say completely different things. Both sides cannot be right and yet they have similar number of voters. The thing is currently it's much more safer to restrict freedom of speech. Because in America we talk about 2 similar sized blocks, but I know countries where the "wrong" people are actually the majority. And yes, they, without a doubt, burn your house to the ground if their politicians would say so. (And it still sounds like you want to make incitement legal. :D ) Why wouldn't humanity allow it? If everyone is perfectly educated then everyone would vote for the best option. So everyone would vote for one party. I mean I assumed you were talking about our election systems. And how are we mentally one of the worst, when 200 years ago every second person was crazy, had PTSD or some other shit? We have a mentally much stable generation. And mostly because we actually somewhat care about mental health. EDIT: Please, reply in a comment, reacting like this is much harder. :D No, there is no unified goal, like communism on the left. Because then I could say the right is about dictatorship but under corporates or they want kings again. I'll give examples then, 4 day working week, unconditional basic income. These are pretty realistic goals. I was referring to the world, but using USA has an example, you should know that those people you're talking about are very much in the minority and that I was referring to purely fictional regions, so the incentive to cause real world damage is not something I support since it's no longer fictional. That education you're talking about is really starting to sound like 1984,but that aside there's no perfect education since every individual is different and those kind of wishes will stay whishes since people aren't robots. And you should know about the suicide statistics, we are more alone than ever even with unprecedented numbers, we lack purpose, the world is dying and we're fully aware of it... We're very bad mentally and your health isn't going to save it, but only help it like a medication not cure it. But you can't separate fiction from reality. Because fiction affects reality in every way. You mentioned suicide. There are shows about suicide and if the show introduce a new point of view or new argument about suicide, then you could use it in a real life. What is wrong with that education? In elections there is always a best option, if everyone could perfectly understand the situation, then everyone would vote for the best option. Suicide statistics are like nothing compared to what war did to the human mind. And war actually affected everyone, because it was everywhere. We are still far the most mentally health generation. (If we lack purpose, then a dream, a goal like a utopian goal could help humanity. You know, the one that you don't like. :DD ) Arguments and incitives are very different, that aside those fictional projects won't be able to do any harm to any sane person so it doesn't matter either way. I'll simply say that your best option isn't the best option for everyone. War is very much a recent event so it kind of proves my point about left progression, that aside you still can't see that the problems right now aren't physical but psychological, people feel little and unimportant, they feel depressed and want to end everything, it's simple this is a bad consequence. And why the :D it really doesn't feel appropriate for these topics. But you don't vote for the best option for yourself. You should vote for the best option for your country, because actually that's the point of the voting. You can examples in the real world, where many rich people are perfectly fine with paying higher taxes if it helps the country. It's not their personal best option, but better for the country. What war are you talking about? :D We are living the a most peaceful era. Wars 200 years ago were part of the daily routine. We are really far from there and the Russia-Ukraine war proves that how alienated we are from the war. The :Ds are there because I find it funny how you present problems that actually could be solved by things that you are against it. If people feel like they don't have a purpose, then an ideology that would create a purpose, would create a goal, is a really good solution even if you consider the end goal unrealistic. But it's much more funny how you think people are much worse state mentally speaking than they were like 200 years ago. Again what you consider better for the country isn't universal, some people prefer anarchy others capitalism, so they will try everything to make their ideal world come true and your education won't work since each person is unique and you would require a 1984 scenario to enforce that. Wars like the one the cold war and the 2 world war, they differently were considerably recent and saying that something similar won't happen again is follish. That goal you want to create won't be followed because in case you haven't noticed people stopped recycling because they no longer believe that the world can be saved, you're severely overestimating the human mind. And besides we already have what you're talking about its called religion. It is universal, because what you talk about is actually the "old" way of voting, where your only option is to follow your own beliefs. While nowadays there is right answer, if you follow the academical researches. My education? Haha, it is the education that needed for your freedom of speech. Those wars are pretty old compared to the new generations right now. They forgot those. While you couldn't forget them like a 100 years earlier, because it was really common. Look, it's hard to avoid using :Ds, when you truly believe people stopped recycling, because they believe they can't save the planet. Most of them don't even believe in climate change. What are you talking about? It seems like to me that you hardly ever talked with someone who is outside of your comfort zone and that makes you believe this really funny scenario where humanity already gave up. Just because it seems like at short term there's no big political difference between parties doesn't mean that at long term things will get extreme, like seriously think ahead. Those 100 years earlier you are talking about where lived by people that had very strong beliefs and compared to today are completely better mentally, like man, their mental resistance and will power us through the roof. You are quite arrogant aren't you, either way, I never stated that it was everyone I gave you an example of how a ultimate goal can do jack to people mentality, you mentioned people who don't believe in climate change wich is completely irrelevant to the ones I'm talking about. They know they could help, they simply don't care. |
Sep 21, 2022 11:34 AM
#93
| yeah after reading the thread ima just delete what I said. yall craycray |
Toxic_HollowSep 21, 2022 11:41 AM
Sep 21, 2022 12:35 PM
#94
Sep 21, 2022 2:23 PM
#96
| I guess in the show Nazarick is portrayed kind of as a Communist, Militaristic Dictatorship. However I think you'll find people enjoy Overlord because of the fantasy world-building, interesting take on isekai and unique characters. I don't think it has anything to do with political affiliations. |
Sep 21, 2022 2:28 PM
#97
VenusErebus said: But there is no world building in this anime.I guess in the show Nazarick is portrayed kind of as a Communist, Militaristic Dictatorship. However I think you'll find people enjoy Overlord because of the fantasy world-building, interesting take on isekai and unique characters. I don't think it has anything to do with political affiliations. We get 10 episodes each season where humans society is shown ... and then 3 episodes where Ainz destroys and kills everything in sight. I've never seen an anime with worse world building. Also worst characters that never evolve beyond the first episode. |
| If you haven't watched "Fantastic Children", don't talk about "best anime". Thank you. |
Sep 21, 2022 2:42 PM
#98
RogerCop said: MxrcoH1Ibxr said: Tf is wrong with you?? XD Animes and politics k bro get a life... Imagine taking everything seriously....... Animes are getting quite political nowadays, with the Lolis and tr*ps, not sure if it's allowed to say the word here. you can say lolis, but not traps. okay |
Sep 21, 2022 5:48 PM
#99
MyllerPhiem said: I hope you don't play video games lol. Do you shed a tear playing Call of Duty?RioFS said: Crazy how OP still thinks people dying in a work of fiction is equivalent to people dying in real life. No, I think enjoying the sight of people being brutally murdered is terrible no matter if its fictional or not. Since watching fictional cartoon characters die hurts your feelwings |
Sep 21, 2022 9:13 PM
#100
Frossy said: RogerCop said: MxrcoH1Ibxr said: Tf is wrong with you?? XD Animes and politics k bro get a life... Imagine taking everything seriously....... Animes are getting quite political nowadays, with the Lolis and tr*ps, not sure if it's allowed to say the word here. you can say lolis, but not traps. okay Mal doesn't allow it? |
More topics from this board
Poll: » Overlord IV Episode 11 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )Stark700 - Sep 13, 2022 |
299 |
by chronicwebemo
»»
Nov 14, 2025 10:54 PM |
|
Poll: » Overlord IV Episode 1 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 )Stark700 - Jul 5, 2022 |
164 |
by CaosDiez
»»
Jul 3, 2025 7:18 AM |
|
Poll: » Overlord IV Episode 9 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )Stark700 - Aug 30, 2022 |
273 |
by S2P_cinephile
»»
Jun 26, 2025 10:46 AM |
|
Poll: » Overlord IV Episode 13 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )Stark700 - Sep 27, 2022 |
505 |
by nando3d1
»»
Jun 12, 2025 10:44 AM |
|
» [Spoiler] demiurge and nazarickritamhalder - May 31, 2025 |
9 |
by NightHowler_19
»»
Jun 3, 2025 10:25 AM |