Forum Settings
Forums
New
Jul 19, 2009 4:27 PM
#1

Offline
Jun 2009
239
The Evangelion threads here on this site are very disappointing because everyone simply states their opinion and leaves. There is no actually discussion and almost all of the points made are mindless with no constructive points made. So it is logical that there should be a thread for the intelligent people to discuss the show and where the average person would not show up. Lastly, before the discussion goes on, I would like to lay down a few rules that are mostly self-explanatory.

Rules:
1. Post intelligent ideas that pertain to the topic(s) being discussed. Since there are many topics in Evangelion, there will no doubt be multiple conversations.
2. Use concrete evidence (such as quoting from the script or using screenshots) to back up your point on debatable issues but they are not required for the rather obvious.
3. Stay on topic. It would be best not to get this thread bogged down in arguing over the Christain religion as many threads on the internet do. Any random posts will be asked to be ignored, asked to be removed, or reported.
4. This is Evangelion and not Lain. So what happens is not highly relative and despite being very confusing, it is much more concrete then you think. The meaning behiend the events is an entirely different story. Again when you are arguing over the events, follow the 2nd rule.
5. Be open-minded, respect the views of others, and try to be civil.

This is a thread that talks about everything in the Evangelion Universe. The manga, the series, the movies, and the new rebuild moveis. Since this is the philosophy club, it would be best to focus on the themes rather on concrete details such as what the new Evangelion statues look like or the music (with the exception of the music relating to the themes).

The best sources are obviouslly Neon Genesis Evangelion itself and I would reccommend a rewatch to anyone who wants to be active in this thread (it should be mandatory but there is no way to enforce that). When you are rewatching it, be extremely observent and would be best that notes are taken. Outside sources are reccomended too but don't rely completely upon them. The best internet sources are Eva Geeks and The Evangelion Discussion on Anime News Network. In addition to watch the series, those two sources should also be studied because they do clear up a lot of question marks about the events. Of the ANN thread, it is really long and copied and pasting the entire thing onto a word document is over 250 pages long. Also Eva Geeks also sucks out a lot of your time.

A few topics of discussion:
1. What does Evangelion mean to you? This topic will probably bring up what seems like unrelated posts into the thread and should be for anyone who hasn't already posted something in this thread yet if you don't want to jump straight into one of ongoing discussions. For the people already here, following up on the post would be most welcoming and
2. What was Anno's intent?
3. The last scene of The End of Evangelion?
4. Why is Shinji/Asuka hated so much? This is probably one of the most divided topics in all of anime, so try and remain civil about it. Also try to avoid what happened to the discussion on ANN where a complete breakdown of communication happened and it practically disolved into camps forming and no one listening to each other.
5. How Evangelion is a deconstruction of a mecha show. Trip_83's comments from the ANN discussion would be a good place to start.

Hope the introductory post was clear and right. If anyone has anything that they want to change with this post, the rules, and some of the topics, just send me a message. Obviously, no one wants a debate of the rules to happen.

Lastly, this club is great because all of the mindless people have been weeded out. More topics like this should be posted on other shows so an actual discussion will happen.
"In the Beginning, the creative energy radiates from within."
-
No, no. That's Lame. Sounds like something out of a Jodorowsky comic.

The Tokusyu Manga Club - Features alternative comics/avant-garde comics/outsider comics/psychdelic comics/surrealistic comics/underground comics + La Nouvelle Manga (part of Alternative).

If I'm here, its because I have nothing better to do.
Reply Disabled for Non-Club Members
Jul 19, 2009 11:36 PM
#2

Offline
Feb 2009
82
Pierre_Bezukhov said:
2. Use concrete evidence (such as quoting from the script or using screenshots) to back up your point on debatable issues but they are not required for the rather obvious
.


This is a rather bad rule, what sence does it make quoting the character, or screenshots? It doesn't really interfere with the discussion, sorryI can't put it in words, don't have so much experience with english.


Pierre_Bezukhov said:
The Evangelion threads here on this site are very disappointing because
1. What does Evangelion mean to you? This topic will probably bring up what seems like unrelated posts into the thread and should be for anyone who hasn't already posted something in this thread yet if you don't want to jump straight into one of ongoing discussions. For the people already here, following up on the post would be most welcoming and


Nothing particular, just interesting story, there was nothing new for me


Pierre_Bezukhov said:

2. What was Anno's intent?

Making money >_>


Pierre_Bezukhov said:

3. The last scene of The End of Evangelion?

Ah yes, that was beautiful, the self destruction of humanity, the powerslavery always leads to that. And the last scene could be intepreted as new Adam & Eve.
The rejection of: instrumentality,the united consciousness and choosing inviduality
Jul 21, 2009 12:46 PM
#3

Offline
Apr 2008
97
I don't know how to make "spoiler" tags or to link screenshots/videos, so I'll simply not do any of it and plainly state my opinion and then see if other opinions can bring changes to my own. So here goes.

For me, NGE was a turning point in my "personnal progress". I always had a problem socializing with others, scared of being hurt and laughed at I was. But then, I saw Shinji, thought of how much a wuss he was and everything. Later on, and especially in the two last episodes, I realized that Shinji was me. In every single flaws he had, every time he screamed, I saw myself. And that's about when I realized it was about damn time I woke up and stoped acting tough and really become tough. I won't explain all the changes it brought to my life but let's say it's major. Then, it changed the way I wrote my novel (cuz yes, I write). Instead of just writing a story about psychology and phylosophy, I decided to do like Anno and write about myself using a lot of different charachters/situations. SO yeah, that's that.

Here's a little analysis I had about four of the main characters.
Firstly, the world revolves around Shinji since we are actually folowing him in the story. What he sees is what we see. (of course there are other viewpoints, but Shinji is without a doubt the main). Considering that, the three other characters (Rei, Misato and Asuka) each represent something very specific to Shinji. Rei, being is mother reincarnate, represents his past, the confort of what he has known and regression. Misato represents his present self, the one who fears everything, who depsises himself and who longs for everyone's support. Then come Asuka, who represents (guess what) his future, because it is scary, enigmatic (this was in the second half of the End of Evangelion if I recall correctly) and always prone at bringing him more pain. But, at the last scene of the movie, only Shinji and Asuka are left. Why? Misato is dead and giant white Rei's (Lilith) got her head sliced up in the background. They are the only ones left. But Shinji still fears what's in front of him : a world full of pain and loneliness. He wants to erase it. He tries to kill Asuka. But she gives him a little reminder that not everything is bad. Shinji bursts in tears and Askua looks at him, despicably. She then says "kimochi warui" (disgusting), probably speaking of him being on top of her, him touching her, him crying on her face and/or his action/attitude he just had.

Alright, now, why Shinji and Asuka are hated so much. Personnaly, I didn't hate them and rather referred to them a lot. But then, it's understandable : they WERE despicalbe all way through and I actually believe this to be intended. They didn't have this charachter growth that was shown only in the End of Evangelion and the very last episode. Most people probably couldn't refer to them and simply stayed stuck at the "they suck" part of the story.

And thats about all I had to say about the topics proposed. Here are some random facts!
Eva 00 (Rei)-Eva 01 (Shinji)-Eva 02 (Asuka) = Past-Present-Future
Eva 00, where 00 resembles the infinite symbol and where there is seemingly an infinite amount of "Rei".
Ikari Shinji translates for Anger (hatred) Truth (genuiness).
The AT field stands for what separates us from everyone else, stops the outside from coming inside but also the inside from going outside.

Also, if someone knows why there are 7 eyes on Seele's mask, well, I'd like to know ^.^
Jul 22, 2009 11:38 AM
#4

Offline
Feb 2009
82
Waza said:

Also, if someone knows why there are 7 eyes on Seele's mask, well, I'd like to know ^.^


Well their symbol is Adams mask, and seven is considered the "holy" or "great" number in many cultures.
I'm not sure but probably thats the case.
Jul 23, 2009 11:28 AM
#5
Offline
Jun 2009
42
Whoa, lots of guidelines...intro post before serious discussion.

Waza said:
For me, NGE was a turning point in my "personnal progress". I always had a problem socializing with others, scared of being hurt and laughed at I was. But then, I saw Shinji, thought of how much a wuss he was and everything. Later on, and especially in the two last episodes, I realized that Shinji was me. In every single flaws he had, every time he screamed, I saw myself. And that's about when I realized it was about damn time I woke up and stoped acting tough and really become tough.


I've got my share of wussy character traits, but I don't see myself as Shinji; who doesn't have to deal with getting hurt, and being scared of it? The way I saw it, all the characters were illustrations of different approaches to problems of identity inevitable with being human. Problems like hurting people as you grow closer aren't solved, but acceptance was probably the best thing Waza could take from it.

NGE is serious popular storytelling, so I mainly judged it as a fictional world that shows us our own more clearly through character interactions. Misato, Shinji, Asuka and Ritsuko all have to wrest their own identity from their parents (framed by the only meaningful religious symbolism in the whole series in Misato's case), largely forced by personal or external factors to repeat their mistakes. With the prophecies driving the entire plot, a theme of inevitability appears, at its most painful in Kaworu, and only broken by Shinji and Asuka respectively rejecting their parents choices and growing to understand them.

Why are these two not liked? Waza described excellently how their character development changes their initial personalities; beforehand if you were really in a crisis with someone like Shnji, or at a party with someone like Asuka, you probably would loath them. Some folk might not like seeing themselves in them either. Another question would be, given their final actions in the anime, and embodiment of many poor qualities, is this dislike deserved?

Waza said:

The AT field stands for what separates us from everyone else, stops the outside from coming inside but also the inside from going outside.


AT fields are very interesting. Suppose the Angels have strong AT fields because there's only one of each kind, as if being unique gave you an aura of holiness (Kaworu refered to it in similar terms) so strong as to be respected by cruise missiles (Israfael, the Twin Angel, had an AT field weak enough for an N2 mine to delay it).

Humans, on the other hand, might have weaker AT fields since they all need to derive their identity from each other (agree with Waza that the AT field seperates people and defines identity). The weaker humans AT fields get, the easier an Instrumentality event would be, something like an evolutionary mechanism for reducing excessively large societies to single entities.

Please reply with thoughts on AT fields, new ideas, and harsh criticism for neglecting the symbolic aspects of evangelion in favour of character analysis. For a start, can character analysis be philosophical?
Jul 23, 2009 11:14 PM
#6

Offline
Feb 2009
82
I want to note few points:

Angels-
What is an Angel? In religion angels are creatures that are more than humans, but at the same time less than them. More-because of their spiritual power and "pureness" (The AT Field could symbolise this), less-because of their lack of free will.
So are Angels in NGE intelegent or not? I think they are ,at least some of them, but still they follow the same routine.
Angels are variations of human evolution. Have you of Australopithecus? They were a branch of homo, so basically two variatons of human evolution existed at the same time, but Australopithecus went extinct. It's hard to believe that they just died away, it could be that they and our ancestors started killing each over but they lost. I'm trying to say that this is similar.



Evangelion-
Evangelions are copys of Angel, artificial humans and artificial gods of sorts.
They represent humanitys god complex issue.
As gods-By creating the idea of god- a thing that should be worshiped, should be aproached with awe and respect -was created a sort of new goal, a thing that should be reached, becoming or creating and controling god. Even now humans tend to play god.
As artificial humans-the interesting part was that ,despite being man-made, to create artficial human was needed an actual human's soul as a core and a pilot to make it move-soul and mind of Evangelion.
ComedianJul 23, 2009 11:17 PM
Aug 12, 2009 6:43 PM
#7
Offline
Jan 2009
136
Okay.... SOOOOO much to talk about here. I will elaborate later, but here's a brief rundown:

1. A deeply personal experience, a symbol of my own coming-of-age, and an inspiration that represents everything I hope to achieve with my career.

2. To create a parable of his own experiences with depression and social alienation and to reach out to others who undergo similar struggles. In short, the same as any artist and auteur: to express himself through his chosen medium. The fact that it made shitloads of money doesn't hurt either, even if a lot of that revenue came from people who literally did not get the message.

3. Like virtually everything in the series, there is ample leeway for personal interpretation, and I literally believe there is no one absolute meaning. If anything, though, it is simply a consolidation of Shinji and Asuka's relationship, which in a way represents the paramount conflict of the series: They finally express open affection for one another as a result of returning to the "real" world, yet Asuka is disgusted/sickened at having returned to a world where pain is inevitable.

4. More to do with the fans than the series, but probably for the same reason so many people hate Shinji himself. They're both pretty screwed-up kids, but the key difference in fans' eyes is that Asuka's "hot", Shinji's not. To be fair, though, it's never really suggested that their relationship is one of true romantic maturity, but rather is developing there and may or may not end up that way - Shinji pretty much states as much, that he'll "inevitably be heartbroken again", but the only way to know for sure is to go forward. In its own way, the song "Everything You've Ever Dreamed" supports this conclusion as well. Hmmmm, maybe I should've written all this under the previous question...

5. How is it ever. The mecha genre in particular, and anime in general. And who knows what else these new movies are deconstructing.

More to come, if anyone ever responds. Haha. IF.
Mar 10, 2010 3:08 PM
#8

Offline
Jun 2009
35
Pierre_Bezukhov said:
Also, if someone knows why there are 7 eyes on Seele's mask, well, I'd like to know ^.^


I'd like to come back to this thread when more time permits, but for now, I can offer my first impression on this.

There are various religions/beliefs that hold the number seven to be divine or have some divine significance, but just by reading how your sentence was constructed, the first thing that jumped to mind was The Seven Seals found in the book of Revelations.
MauvaiseFoiApr 15, 2010 11:51 PM
There is a crack in everything.
That's how the light gets in.
Apr 14, 2010 3:49 PM
#9
Offline
Jan 2009
136
There are a lot of things in sevens. However, I vaguely recall hearing about the "Seven Eyes of God" somewhere... though where, I can't recall.
Jun 2, 2010 10:45 PM

Offline
Jun 2010
565
Comedian said:
I want to note few points:

Angels-
What is an Angel? In religion angels are creatures that are more than humans, but at the same time less than them. More-because of their spiritual power and "pureness" (The AT Field could symbolise this), less-because of their lack of free will.
So are Angels in NGE intelegent or not? I think they are ,at least some of them, but still they follow the same routine.
Angels are variations of human evolution. Have you of Australopithecus? They were a branch of homo, so basically two variatons of human evolution existed at the same time, but Australopithecus went extinct. It's hard to believe that they just died away, it could be that they and our ancestors started killing each over but they lost. I'm trying to say that this is similar.



Evangelion-
Evangelions are copys of Angel, artificial humans and artificial gods of sorts.
They represent humanitys god complex issue.
As gods-By creating the idea of god- a thing that should be worshiped, should be aproached with awe and respect -was created a sort of new goal, a thing that should be reached, becoming or creating and controling god. Even now humans tend to play god.
As artificial humans-the interesting part was that ,despite being man-made, to create artficial human was needed an actual human's soul as a core and a pilot to make it move-soul and mind of Evangelion.


I'm not that good in english, for such a deep theme... well, I'll try my best

Definition of "Angel" varies from one religion to another. You captured the general concept, but SSE (Shin Seiki Evangelion) is heavily based on eastern religions and their premises. Buddhism, Hinduism and alikes have a common belief of looking to "God" as abstract existences, meant to "exist" only on a higher level, and humans supposedly had to understand inner truths and seek to avoid human attachments, eventually merging into that "god''s existence, and ceasing to be a human per se
Thinking about this, you can see SSE Angel are abstractions of such existences, they're "things-like-humans", except that humanity couldn't fulfill their major goal: to merge into Creator
By having this higher understanding, all "Angels" in SSE are seeking to merge into Adam (Lilith), and I strongly believe this is the meaning of being called this name. Humanity were split into individual souls, and this, besides having a spiritual meaning, is also heavily related to japanese society, that priorizes society over individuals, and is often view as a critic view of Hideaki Anno
This "critic view" is possible because the religious "approach" can be directly "mapped" to the society thing: in eastern religions you should merge into higher beings, eventually becoming One that encompasses all. The main idea here is that "shared" mind is "better" than having your own Ego. Same holds on society: for different and unrelated reasons though, your individualitiy is considered "wrong". You can see too that, even being a "good thing" (Seele wants to do it no matter what), merging into god's being will lead to world destruction.

About Evangelion Units: EVA-01 is only child of Lilith. For those not very skilled on theology, Lilith is supposed to be Adam's lover, and often (and in SSE too) considered as human-kind progenitor. As Lilith is aware that their children are seeking God for wrong reasons (Lust and Power) she kills herself with longinus spear. Here the spear stands for "male" in male/female imn phallic abstraction of the sexual act. Evangelions are the trial to successfully clone that God, and their only 100% success is EVA-01
As EVA-00 is nothing but a prototype, it's pretty much like a doll. In ep 23 we can see Ayanami Rei revealing that, if she leaves Unit, AT-Field would be gone and Ikari Shinji would be in danger. "human-like-angel" Kaworu Nagisa later reveals that he can controls Eva because he is also a being born from same "source", and have his own AT-Field because, being no human, his soul is not splitted and have all light. These are very strong evidences that EVA-00 is controlled solely for Ayanami Rei. Ayanami Rei also is not injured in episode 01, as she appears minutes earlier completely healthy. As they say on Seele, they have a Scenario to be reproduced, and Shinji is meant to pilot 01 Unit and he is the only one able to do it.
Why he?
In an accident years earlier, his mother were the original pilot but eventually got merged with 01 Unit, accepting the merging with God. Even merged, her soul still retains some memories (when Human Instrumentality is achieved you can see for instance Misato's memories of her past), and have the primal urge to defend her only child. Therefore, every time Shinji is about to face death, EVA reacts as individual and takes fight for own sake without pilot synchro. Understanding these primal instincts of a mother is fundamental here: it's basically what states that Seele has no option if not trusting Ikari's son

Already talked too much. If someone replies, I would like to continue this, but SSE is not REEEEEEALY a very deep thing... one should never try to find answers to pure metaphores. An example of that is "where Angels come from?". There is no answer for that, because they are meant to represent abstract ideas like "the ones who are not so imperfect and are trying to find their God". mysteries on these Anime ohave to be set apart from metaphores.
Personally, I like S.E.Lain (veeeeery) deeper than SSE. And even deeper, is Boogiepop Phantom
There are 10 types of people in this world: those who understand binary and those who don't
Real men don't use Task Manager: they sudo kill -9
Computers are like air-conditioning: pretty much useless if you open Windows
"I cannot refute you, Socrates." - said Agathon
"Rather, dear Agathon, what you can't refute is the truth; for Socrates is easily refuted."
Symposium - Plato
Jun 3, 2010 9:05 AM
Offline
Jan 2009
136
Your ideas about the Angels are pretty interesting; I'd never thought about them in those terms before, but it makes sense. Personally, I always equated SEELE's ideology with the desire in Abrahamic religions to ascend to Heaven or return to Paradise - the belief that, after the end of the world, humankind will live in perfect harmony, which Evangelion also posits as being analogous to the desire to return to the womb. Such a world would require the elimination of all human conflicts, and since (according to Evangelion) the source of all conflict is individuality, the only way to attain this would be to completely wipe away all human identity, merging all human consciousness into a penultimate being.

Rei faking being injured in the first episode, though? That seems like a bit of a stretch. I think it's established repeatedly throughout the series that Rei (or possibly the dead Reis) have a sort of spiritual presence that extends beyond their bodies. For instance, numerous characters in The End of Evangelion see apparitions of Rei before they die (and before Instrumentality begins), even though it's well-established that Rei's physical body is elsewhere (in one case, elsewhere in the same room). Rei is kind of a specter of death, and seems to take on the identity and purposes of several Judeo-Christian angels... but that's a discussion for another time.

But hold on just a second. How exactly do you determine what's "deeper" than what else? I mean, what's your system of measurement? A Pedanticometer?? Contrary to popular belief, Evangelion's depth is not illusory; there are a number of highly complex and compelling themes simmering around under the surface, and they're not all obvious. What exactly are your criteria for determining the "hierarchy of Deepness"?
Jun 3, 2010 12:16 PM

Offline
Jun 2010
565
gatotsu911But hold on just a second. How exactly do you determine what's "deeper" than what else? I mean, what's your system of measurement? A Pedanticometer?? Contrary to popular belief, Evangelion's depth is not illusory; there are a number of highly complex and compelling themes simmering around under the surface, and they're not all obvious. What exactly are your criteria for determining the "hierarchy of Deepness"?[/quote said:


Comparison with another titles. I know the same holds for Elfen Lied topic below, but I was not exactly saying Evangelion "IS" (in a strict and absolute sense) "NOT DEEP" (just compared it with BP and SEL). As long the observed objects are ultimately related to the being who observes it, they're not essentially the same, therefore one could say that Mickey Mouse is a deep character, and there is no way to prove that it's not, except using strict definitions (and again, those definitions could or not be accepted by parts)
There are 10 types of people in this world: those who understand binary and those who don't
Real men don't use Task Manager: they sudo kill -9
Computers are like air-conditioning: pretty much useless if you open Windows
"I cannot refute you, Socrates." - said Agathon
"Rather, dear Agathon, what you can't refute is the truth; for Socrates is easily refuted."
Symposium - Plato
Jun 3, 2010 8:09 PM

Offline
Jun 2010
565
Now I've read this more carefully

3 - Let me tell something not very good about "The End of Evangelion": in late 90's Gainax was almost facing bankrupt, then they took their most successful creation (SSE) and made that movie, with $$$ intentions only. That's why "End of Eva" has explicit violence and sex themes.

4 - Conceptual model for a family on japan society is well formed and amost a "cliche". Works basically like this:
- The father is called the "salaryman". His role is to provide financial support for the family, and he is not very much close to his kids.
- The Mother is supposed to raise their children, providing emotional support and often spoiling first male child. Such "spoiling-thing-phenomena" is often called "AMAE" and may lead to emotional problems. Older, spoiled son, becomes overprotected and develops fear of social interaction, while his brothers often have trauma because they don't receive same treatment.
- Male child, specially first one, grows up often not very close to his father, and spoiled by his mother, but society creates a pressure over him: he is the next man, and he is supposed to have higher grades and live in constant competition. This social pressure leads to insane fear of failure and can end up in suicide
- Female child are often treated like "do-what-you-want" by parents. They often try to get attention, and grow up alone, reaching maturity earlier than boys.

Eva depicts this model: Soryu Asuka is in love with Kaji, an older man with can play a role of a father, who is probably either distant ou absent at all (or even dead). She is always trying to get attention because most people pay more attention to Ikari Shinji (the "male child"). In Japan is not rare a girl express her feeling to a boy. Woman have more initiative as man are "shy". In spite of all this, Shinji is often hated by his weak posture in life facing problems, some may consider it annoying and disturbing as depicts lack of attitude. Asuka is often hated for the direct opposite reason: when dealing with a sensitive and problematic boy she is considered arrogant and uncomprehensive, often trying to project his pain on him, once he is sometimes the source of that pain by drawing more attention from people. It's quite obvious that Asuka's persona is not a model of kindness and good manners

1 - Evangelion is a good plot (the discovery of God in North Pole and the accident with Ikari Yui) and metaphore (do we have to search, find, or even create if we run out of options, God: Yes or No). I personally like Anime answer to that: in Lilith's "uterus" Ikari Shinji merges into God Conscience and starts questioning something interesting: maybe I fell fine here, confortable, but feeling like this is really better? Yes, society as they are have MANY problems, but I still wanted to live and even USE those problems in order to personal evolution and learning. It an even better conclusion because Shinji has emotional problems, showing that even he could understand the value of "imperfect no-divine" world.
Personally, if I go into an EVA Unit someday, I'll synchronize let me see... 600% ou 700% and NEVER get out of there....
There are 10 types of people in this world: those who understand binary and those who don't
Real men don't use Task Manager: they sudo kill -9
Computers are like air-conditioning: pretty much useless if you open Windows
"I cannot refute you, Socrates." - said Agathon
"Rather, dear Agathon, what you can't refute is the truth; for Socrates is easily refuted."
Symposium - Plato
Jun 7, 2010 4:09 PM
Offline
Jan 2009
136
You're not going to convince me that Evangelion is more or less "deep" than any of the other series you mentioned without specific examples - especially when "depth" is such a vaguely-defined concept as is.

fredi-sj said:
]3 - Let me tell something not very good about "The End of Evangelion": in late 90's Gainax was almost facing bankrupt, then they took their most successful creation (SSE) and made that movie, with $$$ intentions only. That's why "End of Eva" has explicit violence and sex themes.


How exactly do you figure this? EoE is about the farthest thing from fan-pandering I can possibly imagine.
Jun 8, 2010 12:15 AM

Offline
Jun 2010
565
Well, I could point specific examples I guess, but still IS a personal view... "deep" is, as you said, relative concepts. Even if some of them eventually "convince" you, it was not my real intention at first. I could point some good stuff about Lain and Boogiepop if you want.

Now about your SECOND question....
Focus on fightning scenes.. lack of abstract thinking... Misato (MILF - God, how I HATE MILFS) kissing Shinji (teenager) and
well
Did you REALLY watched the first scene at the hospital....?
Things on EoE that supports what I've said:
- Focus on concrete answers instead of abstract problems (people don't usually like to think, easy plot = more $$$)
- Focus on "Mecha" fighting (EVA UNIT's are human-like beings controlled with external armor and devices for mind synchro and all that Uterus abstraction to resemble Mother of Humanity, but just watching the stupid useless hysterical girl in her Red Gundam slashing Seele's Mecha seems more cool, therefore, more $$$)
- Explicit exploration over sex themes: real sex between Shinji and Misato has never really occured, but Shinji's persona resembles like I've said many teenagers in Japan, and many of them were SSE fans. Same holds for the masturbation scene. Did you ever read "Lolita" from Vladimir Nabokov? It has the fourth place on most read english publications on 20th century. In spite of this theme and suggestive title, it hasn't one single line of pornography. It's entirely based on deep analysis of Humbert's psyche. If you think you have to take off Misato/Asuka/whoever' clothes to pierce into EVA fan desires, you're wrong. Search the Internet. "Kiss" scene and "masturbating" scene are both most often remembered. 1st place, though, is probably the last scene. But those two follows it on "popularity". In fact, it's a real shame that such a good and deep show (yes, I THINK it is deep BUT NOT like Lain and Boogiepop) is so often rememebered as a "Asuka kicks their asses!" or "Shinji is so perverted" or "I don't really understand that bullshit on final scene but liked Seele's fight!".
Do you play chess? Let's suppose you play white and you have a rook in d1, defended by another rook in a1. You opponent have a rook in d8 and a rook in a8, same situation. Let's assume that it's an open column (withoiut pawns) and is unblocked by other pieces. In this situation, none can really takes the another rook. If you play Rxd8, black will play Rxd8 and has, alone, control over the column. Same holds for the opposite: black playing Rxd1 and you replying Rxd1. Therefore their power is hold only with the threat, as being the first to make the move would lead to unpleasant position.
Same with EVA: metaphores are supposed to suggest ideas and abstract concepts. Most people wants a CONCRETE EXACT LOGICAL meaning for EVERYTHING on the plot. EoE was trying to do it to please fans and get some $$$ support (like I've said, they were about to break...)
Sorry. I THINK (now I will "append" this 'i think' on every sentence) SSE is good series, good plot, deep approach... ok.
EoE is SSE for dummies. ("I THINK")
There are 10 types of people in this world: those who understand binary and those who don't
Real men don't use Task Manager: they sudo kill -9
Computers are like air-conditioning: pretty much useless if you open Windows
"I cannot refute you, Socrates." - said Agathon
"Rather, dear Agathon, what you can't refute is the truth; for Socrates is easily refuted."
Symposium - Plato
Jun 8, 2010 12:35 AM

Offline
Jun 2010
565
Now I would like to raise a new question. It's probably "off-topic", but I don't know if making a new thread would be really necessary for that. It is still Gainax.
I was speaking about metaphores and I've remembered a true masterpiece. It have the subtlety and elegance of Anderssen games, Agatha Christie's mysteries, or (in a more "ludic" sense), Morpheus' last move against Chronzon (Sandman: Nocturnal and Preludes - Neil Gailman): The sex scene on Karekano ep 18.
Never have seen such a beautiful scene.. depicting perfectly all feelings of spirit over a so obvious act of "flesh". I realized those things exists inside us but (maybe because of physical pleasure) we can't really perceive it always. And, knowing it or not, putting that into that form, shape, representation. I could easily call "king of metaphores". Maybe I'm overreacting, specially because that doesn't fit STRICTLY on definition of "metaphore". But I'm using it to make this fair and proud compliment to that episode.
There are 10 types of people in this world: those who understand binary and those who don't
Real men don't use Task Manager: they sudo kill -9
Computers are like air-conditioning: pretty much useless if you open Windows
"I cannot refute you, Socrates." - said Agathon
"Rather, dear Agathon, what you can't refute is the truth; for Socrates is easily refuted."
Symposium - Plato
Jun 8, 2010 9:36 AM
Offline
Jan 2009
136
fredi-sj said:
Now about your SECOND question....
Focus on fightning scenes.. lack of abstract thinking... Misato (MILF - God, how I HATE MILFS) kissing Shinji (teenager) and
well
Did you REALLY watched the first scene at the hospital....?

I'm pretty sure both of these scenes were intended to upset viewers, not titillate them. You'd have to be pretty twisted to get off on either of those. Sex can be used in storytelling as a way of making audiences uncomfortable, not just as a means of exciting them. (See my point below.)

]Things on EoE that supports what I've said:
- Focus on concrete answers instead of abstract problems (people don't usually like to think, easy plot = more $$$) [/quote said:


Now might be a good time to point out that one of the most commonly-held ideas as to why the TV finale ended up the way it did is that the original scripts for the final two episodes were rejected by the network due to their graphic content, thus the abstract, low-budget episodes were made in their place. In other words, EoE represents the ending that was originally intended, as evidenced by references in episodes 25 and 26 to events in EoE (e.g. Asuka at the bottom of the lake and the deaths of Misato and Ritsuko). And if you think EoE doesn't address abstract concepts, I'm guessing you didn't pay too close attention during the second half.

] - Focus on "Mecha" fighting (EVA UNIT's are human-like beings controlled with external armor and devices for mind synchro and all that Uterus abstraction to resemble Mother of Humanity, but just watching the stupid useless hysterical girl in her Red Gundam slashing Seele's Mecha seems more cool, therefore, more $$$) [/quote said:

How can you level this indictment at the movie as opposed to the rest of the series? The mecha element was there from day one, even if it ultimately fell to the background in the face of the human drama. Also, see my point above; this is very likely what was planned from the time Anno and co. were still working on the TV series. And I don't know if this is just me, but personally I found seeing such a familiar character act with such startling brutality - even if it was toward non-human entities - far more disturbing than "cool", especially when set to Bach's "Air on a G string".

] - Explicit exploration over sex themes: real sex between Shinji and Misato has never really occured, but Shinji's [i said:
persona resembles like I've said many teenagers in Japan, and many of them were SSE fans. Same holds for the masturbation scene. Did you ever read "Lolita" from Vladimir Nabokov? It has the fourth place on most read english publications on 20th century. In spite of this theme and suggestive title, it hasn't one single line of pornography. It's entirely based on deep analysis of Humbert's psyche. If you think you have to take off Misato/Asuka/whoever' clothes to pierce into EVA fan desires, you're wrong. Search the Internet. "Kiss" scene and "masturbating" scene are both most often remembered. 1st place, though, is probably the last scene. But those two follows it on "popularity". In fact, it's a real shame that such a good and deep show (yes, I THINK it is deep BUT NOT like Lain and Boogiepop) is so often rememebered as a "Asuka kicks their asses!" or "Shinji is so perverted" or "I don't really understand that bullshit on final scene but liked Seele's fight!".

Whoa, whoa, hold the boat here. Explicit depiction of sex in a work automatically constitutes smut? You'd better never see a David Cronenberg film. Actually, I'm not that big a fan of David Cronenberg either, so let me just get right to the point: Like I said above, there are more uses for sex in art than simply titillating audiences. It can be used to (as I said) make them uncomfortable, or to peer into the deepest psychological realms of characters, and I think the prevalent sexual themes in EoE (even moreso than the series proper) are used strictly for those purposes. Fans don't remember the masturbation scene because they thought it was sexy, they remember it because it was disturbing and unpleasant, and a chilling illustration of just how fucked up Shinji's psyche was at that point in the story. Likewise (albeit to a lesser extent) with the kiss scene. And really, it's (mostly) not the fault of the artist or the work if most of his audience misinterprets it; do you blame Nietzsche or Beethoven for the ways in which their works were interpreted by Nazi Germany? Also worth noting is the fact that Lolita (which I haven't yet read, but want to) was written in the early 1950's, a time when standards for explicit themes and content were much lower than today. Nabokov was already pushing a number of social taboos quite hard as it was; I'm sure he was in no hurry to risk the already-present possibility of his work being branded as pornography by the moral-policing public. However, if the book had been written by a modern author for modern audiences, it would very likely, for better or worse, be more graphic.

]Do you play chess? Let's suppose you play white and you have a rook in d1, defended by another rook in a1. You opponent have a rook in d8 and a rook in a8, same situation. Let's assume that it's an open column (withoiut pawns) and is unblocked by other pieces. In this situation, none can really takes the another rook. If you play Rxd8, black will play Rxd8 and has, alone, control over the column. Same holds for the opposite: black playing Rxd1 and you replying Rxd1. Therefore their power is hold only with the threat, as being the first to make the move would lead to unpleasant position.[/quote said:

Yeah, sorry, not following this analogy at all.

]Same with EVA: metaphores are supposed to suggest ideas and abstract concepts. Most people wants a CONCRETE EXACT LOGICAL meaning for EVERYTHING on the plot. EoE was trying to do it to please fans and get some $$$ support (like I've said, they were about to break...) [/quote said:

I wonder whether you might be confusing metaphors with symbolism. Eva has a plot - an actual plot - with a lot of symbolic elements. You could argue that the plot itself is a metaphor - for growing up, for fighting depression, for the sociology of postwar Japan - but there IS an actual plot. The TV ending aborted many plot threads that had been slowly and carefully built up over the course of the entire show; it is only logical that they would seek to eventually see them through to their conclusion. That said, I would hardly suggest that EoE gives viewers concrete answers - on the contrary, it is very aggressive about informing them that it will not (see the infamous "Gendo's line" - which is probably even more notorious than the kiss scene, actually). Again, it merely sees the threads that were built up over the course of the series to their conclusion and explores some thematic material complementary to the TV ending, but it definitely doesn't give all the answers on a silver platter, and in fact quite strongly insists that viewers must make their own (which is itself, in my opinion, a metaphor for the themes of self-discovery and "finding your own answers" in life).

]Sorry. I THINK (now I will "append" this 'i think' on every sentence) SSE is good series, good plot, deep approach... ok.
EoE is SSE for dummies. ("I THINK")[/quote said:


Hey, no need to apologize. This is discussion board about philosophy - it pretty much goes without saying that anything you, I, or anybody else expresses here strictly represents their own opinion unless otherwise noted. At least you have the integrity to admit that. And don't take anything I say personally - I'm just trying to have an interesting debate, and so far I think we've been succeeding. I respect you as a fellow Thinker of Thoughts, even if I happen not to agree with all of your opinions.
Jun 8, 2010 3:52 PM

Offline
Jun 2010
565
Well, now we are almost reaching a single point
Ok, I admit that I could have been impressed with Gainax financial problems when releasing EoE.
I still hold my opinion about concrete X abstract. I could have pushed it so far when said that it was done to "please audience". Maybe not. Even so, I personally found it more focused on concrete answer.
This story about rejecting scripts is almost the same as what I've said about bankrupcy... we'll never know the truth. Let me just say that, if SSE was orignially intended to end like EoE, then I don't know WHO actually rejected it, but I agree.
Maybe I was confunsing metaphores, symbolisms, and many others elements alike, but regardless of semantics I was talking about those thoughts and phylosophy about freedom, limits, flaws, flawless, and all subjects related to religions itself. Actually, you're right when you say that EoE depicts some of those in "second half". Nevertheless, I prefer the abstract way of ep 25 and 26. I disagree they are same thing, but let's assume they are. Well, so you could place a scene with Miyazawa and Arima-Kun in bed in Karekano 18. I would just ignore it. The way is was done (be it symbolism, metaphores, ou whatever), is what makes me think of it as a masterpiece, work of genius.
You're right abou t sex. I agree specially about the masturbation scene, it was intended to show disturbed psyche of Ikari Shinji. Again, I think this disturbance was made clear eve without explicit scene. Yes, you maybe have noticed, I like that abstract approach of deep themes, like I love a game dangerous where any player, by not wanting to move his rook, could forget about that and make a mistake. It excites me.
There are 10 types of people in this world: those who understand binary and those who don't
Real men don't use Task Manager: they sudo kill -9
Computers are like air-conditioning: pretty much useless if you open Windows
"I cannot refute you, Socrates." - said Agathon
"Rather, dear Agathon, what you can't refute is the truth; for Socrates is easily refuted."
Symposium - Plato
Jun 10, 2010 9:51 AM
Offline
Jan 2009
136
I'm not going to argue that EoE isn't more concrete than the TV ending, because it is - but only really by comparison.

It's fine if you personally prefer more abstract depictions and discussions of subjects as opposed to literal ones - I have a fondness for abstract ideas as well - but I don't think that belittles the quality of EoE as a work of film. And honestly, EoE was a lot more discreet than it could have been. If it were directed by David Cronenberg, you would have SEEN Shinji masturbating and SEEN Misato and Kaji having sex, because David Cronenberg doesn't give a shit about nuance or discretion unless it involves Viggo Mortensen's penis.

There's a time and a place for graphic content, and I think EoE uses it pretty well. It definitely wouldn't be the same movie with its content toned down.
Reply Disabled for Non-Club Members

More topics from this board

» Philosophical Quote Debate #2: Max Stirner

GonzyChan - Dec 15, 2013

1 by Neostorm-X »»
Jun 27, 2022 11:01 AM

Sticky: » New Member Introduction Thread ( 1 2 )

Lithic - Jan 26, 2014

70 by morimemen »»
Jun 27, 2020 5:30 PM

» Club Relations ( 1 2 )

Danish - Apr 12, 2009

69 by missbellerophon »»
Aug 2, 2016 3:02 PM

» THE COVER PHOTO

PsychoX - May 3, 2016

0 by PsychoX »»
May 3, 2016 4:34 AM

» To the Bookshelf: Post Your Latest Texts

PleiadesRising - Sep 25, 2012

10 by removed-user »»
Jul 6, 2015 4:16 PM
It’s time to ditch the text file.
Keep track of your anime easily by creating your own list.
Sign Up Login