Report komoset's Profile

Sorry by the way, I'm not a fun guy to talk to, my bad

I am neither a therapist nor a psychiatrist, so I am not in any way informed when it comes to behavioral patterns like this one, but I wouldn't link an interest in negative argumentation with any kind of mental problem. It is natural to look at negative reviews on shows I like, because there are quite frankly not a lot of shows I hate and just a lot of shows I don't care about, thus the only shows that I have an interest in reading reviews would be those I like. Reading negative reviews about media I enjoy gives me an opportunity to see how people that didn't like those pieces of media feel about them and how they formed their views in the first place. If one's argumentation in a negative review is bad, and I can disprove it, that gives me an opportunity to share my critical view on said media and at the same time gives me new room to ponder and consider aspects of a given work. This, for me at least, has been the best way to gain a well-formed critical view on media as I openly interact with the opposing view and this enables me to have a more well-rounded perspective, because while I do mostly disagree with whatever reviewer I address, they, a lot of the times either have one or two points I can get behind or at the very least showcase the hypocrisy at the core of a lot of media criticism. I personally don't see anything wrong with this kind of approach, it is at the very least a lot more respectful and engaging than the hateful and a lot of the time nonsensical comments that people leave under the profiles of said reviews. If you disagree, which you can absolutely do, though I will not address you as if you are an actual doctor, I will be open for a respectful discussion, though a doctor should have a better way of using their time, then to discredit an actual argument, something a review should be expected to have, with a joke.

As a doctor, which I most definitely am, just believe me on this one, you should see the value in an argumentation and shouldn't let your pre-biases and inconclusive view on this matter decide whether or not it is a discussion worth having. Because I like talking about media and the psychological implications of both how we approach art and said art itself and at least the way I see it, there is nothing wrong with that.

If you don't like me, good for you, have an A1-Day, either engage in an actual argument, that could be fun or leave it at a joke and just cut it here, I'm fine with both.