Stranger

Edit

What would you like to edit?

SynopsisBackgroundAlternative TitlesPictureChapters/VolumesPublishing DatesRelationsTypeExternal Links  

It's a slow story. It doesn't have a goal, so for me, it was a little boring. It's the kind of story where the point is to follow the couple's development, and it's not the kind of story that keeps me entertained. I prefer stories with some other goal.
When I got to the fateful chapter that I saw a lot of people give up on reading, I was a little confused. Like, did uke also feel desire for seme and that's why he decided to distract himself with someone else? When I saw that he could be with seme legally, did he give himself the ... green light? Or did he just want to comply with seme's wishes?
This uke frustrated me. He's not an expressive character, he talks, but nothing on his face or actions makes us feel that he's interested in seme. Seme doesn't talk, but he has a transparent face. Unfortunately, from what I read, the story didn't manage to grab my attention.
It's not a bad story, it's just not the kind of story I personally find interesting.

In fiction, any theme can be explored, no matter how controversial. The beauty of storytelling lies in its ability to delve into complex, often uncomfortable aspects of the human experience - at least I think so anyway. However, I believe it's crucial that these themes serve a purpose and are handled with care. The creator of this manhwa failed to critically reflect on their story and themes surrounding it. We have a 17 year old character who seemingly falls for an older man, which is fine but when you have the objectification and sexualization of a minor.... When stories introduce unethical elements or sensitive topics, ... it's vital for the narrative to reflect on these aspects critically rather than romanticizing or trivializing them. For instance, age-gap relationships (depicted in this manhwa), particularly those involving very young adults, are a delicate subject. When a character who has just turned 18 is suddenly objectified by an older man, with comments like "I imagined your body would look like this," it’s deeply problematic if this behavior is portrayed as normal or acceptable without any critical examination. Which is the case in this story.

Am I badgering this simply because of an age-gap relationship? Not at all. I am reflecting on the themes, the message being shared and how that message unfolds and is delivered within the story. Such portrayals can inadvertently send harmful messages if they’re not thoughtfully explored. It's essential for authors to engage with these themes responsibly, examining the implications and the ethical dimensions within the story. This kind of critical exploration can lead to richer, more meaningful narratives that resonate with readers and provoke thoughtful reflection.

When sensitive themes are included merely for shock value or to drive the plot without a deeper examination, they risk perpetuating harmful stereotypes or normalizing unethical behavior. Which this story has done. Stories should strive to illuminate and interrogate these themes, offering insight and fostering understanding, rather than glossing over the complexities involved. I welcome fiction to be daring and controversial but with an awareness and with care.