Sep 16, 2012
I'm going to keep this very short since I did this really to give those who have seen season one and intend on watching season two. For those of you who wish/intend to do that, I say: you will be disappointed.
Yes, here we have yet another example of how authors can go the wrong way when doing works for many reasons. Sad to say, I'm not completely sure which reason the author of Seikon no Qwaser went the wrong direction, but the most common reason would simply be a lack of planning and plotting things out.
I mean, the first season, in my point of view,
...
was just 'okay'. I didn't have anything special about it, but it at least had managed to score a overall five for me. The main reason would be because of the stimulating ecchi in it that all of us I'm sure was watching it for. But, as the old saying goes too much of a good thing is a bad thing, and eventually I began to actually like it a little bit for the plot, and especially the idea. I mean, getting energy from breast milk? It isn't the most decent idea as its just for stimulation of the watchers, but it still was creative in a sense.
But, then we have Seikon no Qwaser II. Usually when a writer makes a part one to a series,e specially like Seikon no Qwaser they have the first season just be ecchi to get the watchers stimulated. But as I said, eventually the watchers would want some actual plot in-cooperate into the entire thing rather than just mindless soft pornography. Seikon no Qwaser fails because of this as it didn't do any such thing. Instead of coming with a reasonable plot--even if it isn't the best--it comes with probably the worst plot ever that focus even more on mindless ecchi. The ecchi wasn't even good enough to make me care anymore, as one would expect the author to in-cooperate more ecchi to cover the terrible plot.
Maybe it was just my expectations that made the season two a let down, but I doubt it considering the reviews.
Overall, it scores a three that borders to be a two for me. Not even ecchi can cover the bad plot.
Reviewer’s Rating: 3
What did you think of this review?
Nice
0
Love it
0
Funny
0
Confusing
0
Well-written
0
Creative
0Show all